Sunday, November 24, 2013

A Vibrant Advocacy

A lot has been happening in Zion over the past few weeks, much of which I have commented on over at the Fischer for Zion facebook page.  When I first sat down at the keyboard this morning, my intent was to look at these stories in turn, analyze each one, and comment on them.  Then I started writing, and realized that I was wandering into a labyrinth where each event brings forth more questions, other issues, and then it spirals off in a new direction, sometimes coming to a dead end. So, I stepped back from trying to parse each issue separately to looking at how to approach them overall, as a government, and a constituency.

Over the past month or so, it seems that Zion only appears on the radar of the wider world when there is a tragedy, a murder, or a scandal to report.  But, that's not the whole story, and I think we can all look around and see good people doing good work, each in their own way trying to make the city better.  That is the narrative we all need to work on presenting to the world. Not simple civic boosterism, but one that acknowledges our problems, and also shows that we are actively working to solve them.

This is going to require a real change in habit and philosophy on the part of the Mayor and our Commissioner's.  For too long, especially since the troubles with the baseball stadium started, there has been a tendency to remain silent in the face of accusations, to avoid the press, and to clear public statements with legal counsel.  As I see it, this strategy of standing mute and waiting for the truth to come out in the end is fundamentally flawed, and it is actually hurting the city's prospects by feeding that negative narrative that has become the face that Zion presents to the world.

What we truly need from our civic leadership is a vibrant and articulate advocacy on behalf of the city and it's people. An advocacy that establishes a new narrative that isn't couched in nostalgia, but expresses a confident and progressive vision of the future.  Whether our current leaders are capable or willing to take up the challenge remains to be seen.

Silence and indifference are two of our greatest foes, to defeat them we must speak out with voices clear and strong. All of us, together.

A quick note:

For the one or two people who might be interested, I am still doing research for the long promised "Trustee No.7" post about infrastructure.  In the meantime, if you ever want to give yourself a good scare, I suggest that you take a look at the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure.  After reading through it, you will probably never want to drive across a bridge again.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

What is an Acceptable Business?


A bit of seedier history in Chicago's River North - author's photo.
At this past Tuesday's City Council meeting,  I took special note that Lloyd DeTienne was the lone vote against  both the zoning text amendment, and special use permit to allow a tattoo parlor to set up shop on Lewis Ave. He offered no explanation for why opposed this particular business, so we can only speculate at his reason.  Perhaps he will enlighten the public some time in the future.
 
If the reason was that he found the idea of a tattoo parlor in Zion to be inappropriate, or morally offensive in some way,  his action was in marked contrast to what occurred later in the same meeting.
 
One of the last items on the agenda was a request from the owners of the Dungeon of Doom haunted house. After discussion with Finance Director David Knable,  the owners approached the Council to gauge their reaction to a proposed deal on entertainment taxes that would give them incentive to invest a half-million dollars to purchase a building near their current location, and expand their business. 

For those who may not be aware of the history, when the Dungeon of Doom was first proposed some three years ago there were a number of objections from some citizens, based on their moral and religious beliefs.  Others raised concerns about traffic problems, or the potential for disruptive behavior.  

In the discussion at this meeting, it was noted that none of these concerns had come to pass, and that the Dungeon has become a major revenue generator for the City, and other businesses. The proprietors have been engaged with the community, and have donated to local charities. In other words, they have become the type of acceptable business that we want to have in our city.  With those facts in consideration, the council indicated that they would be open to the proposed arrangement. Altogether, a win-win for everyone concerned.

Which leads me back to the question of the tattoo parlor, and to ask whether by it's very nature is it an unacceptable business?

Historically, tattoo parlors were restricted to "red light" districts that catered to those seeking entertainment involving sex, booze, or drugs in any combination. A world that usually operated on the edge of, or outside the law, and often encompassed pawn shops, circus sideshows, and haunted houses.

 A past that is exemplified by the sign in photo above, which I took on Clark Street in the Courthouse District of Chicago. The building, which had until recently hosted an adult bookstore was being rehabbed, revealing an even older incarnation as a strip club, when the neighborhood was truly "red light". Today the area is filled with high-end restaurants, pricey condos, and office towers. 

But, cultural norms have shifted in the last thirty years, and a practice that was once only the province of sailors, bikers, and gangsters has become commonplace.  Skin art, has become an accepted form of personal expression, and style at all levels of society.  Of course, part of the appeal is the patina of  being an "outlaw", being just a little more sexy, or outrageous for having one.  

Images of butterflies and Hello Kitty not withstanding.

In the end, I think what makes a business acceptable depends not so much on what they do, but in the behavior of the owners and the employees.  If they provide goods and services in a friendly manner with honesty and integrity, then I think they become an acceptable addition to our business community.  I hope the owners of this new venture in our city operate in that manner, and may they have much success.

If you, having read this want to share your thoughts on what is an acceptable business, put them into the comments below.  I look forward to hearing from you.





 
 

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

"One-Time Dollars"


Fielders Stadium in 2012

The August 20th, 2013 City Council meeting centered on a lengthy discussion around the necessity of raising water, sewer, and waste collection rates to cover the projected costs of those services this fiscal year.  Under ordinary circumstances, a minor rate increase would probably pass unnoticed by most people, until they looked at their quarterly bill from the City.

In this case, the reasons for the increase merit special notice, because they are the unintended consequences of decisions made over a period of years.

The first decision, which to my mind is stunning in it's short-sightedness is that the City had not changed the water rate for almost ten years.  Apparently, the city got into the habit of relying on the surplus in the Water Enterprise Fund to cover the difference.

That surplus was created in part by the connection fees collected from new construction and service connections to the Midwest Regional Medical Center. Dave Knable, the city Finance Director described these as "one-time dollars", a windfall that will probably never occur again. According to published reports this surplus amounted to at least $2,300,000 dollars or more.

Now, the fund is so depleted that it is necessary to raise the rates to keep it from going into deficit. 

Where did that money go?

The First Loan


In 2009, the City discovered that they were facing a critical deficit.  At the March 17, meeting the Council approved a loan from the Water Fund in the amount of $3,200,000 to the General Fund to help with the debt. The plan was that the city would eventually repay that borrowed money back to the Water Fund.

At this recent council meeting Mayor Harrison gave a spirited defense of this action, that by doing so, jobs and services were maintained without resorting to raising taxes. It is a legitimate argument, after all a crisis was averted, and the taxpayers were spared the pain of cut services, or higher property taxes.  Where else did that money go? To answer that, we need to provide some background.

The Baseball Stadium


Just a month before the $3 million dollar loan was taken from the Water Fund, the Mayor announced that in 2010, a new minor league baseball team would be coming to Zion, along with a stadium that would include year-round retail and banquet facilities.  Press reports emphasized that local taxpayers would not bear any of the costs. The team owners, investors, and a development grant from the State would pay for the project. Even until March of 2011, an announcement was still posted on the city website about the imminent start of construction on the stadium that stated; “The team owners and developers are accepting the responsibility for the full cost of the project, including the parking and land lease commitments.”

It didn't quite turn out that way. 

After the announcement, those of us who were excited about the possibility of having a minor league team just down the road, watched as groundwork was started at the announced location at the corner of 9th and Green Bay Road. Then, everything suddenly came to a halt, why?

The answer can be found in the minutes of a special City Council Meeting, held on April 9, 2010. Here is the relevant text:

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/BASEBALL STADIUM
 
Delaine Rogers stated without State assistance the 9th Street and Green Bay Road site for the Lake County Fielders baseball stadium will not be possible, therefore, developers and staff have been reviewing alternate sites for the baseball stadium. Ms. Rogers introduced Jason Rosenburg, Panattoni, Rick DeLisle, Lee and Associates, Rick Ehrenreich, President of Grand Slam Sports and Entertainment, and Warner Briske and Andrea Ceclia, Partners in Design with the following proposal:
  • Locating the baseball stadium on the northeast corner of Route 173 and Green Bay Road, directly northeast of CVS Pharmacy
  • Over $1 million in improvements are at this site, including zoning, permitting infrastructure, etc
  • The site plan would include retail stores along Route 173, as well as a retail corridor and possible theater on Green Bay Road
  • A press release is being prepared by the developers

Rich Ehrenreich stated the aggressive plan includes groundwork starting next week involving a private landowners partnership. Mr. Ehrenreich stated, because of the added retail attraction, private investors are interested. The construction plan would include bleacher seating this year with the building by next season. Ms. Rogers stated the Illinois Department of Commerce and Community Affairs did provide some funding, which can be used at this site.
 
Ron Colangelo stated he has a meeting with Lake County Stormwater Management next week for permitting and discussing the multi-phase construction. Ms. Rogers stated the plan includes a 25-year lease with a property agreement. The City would lease the property from the partnership, in order to control the project and allow it to remain tax-exempt from real estate taxes until such time as retail is added. This plan would allow the project to start as soon as possible. Mr. Ehrenreich stated it is a 6 – 8 week process to build the field. Rick DeLisle stated he is meeting with Veolia regarding a plan to help provide the material for the berming.

Commissioner Jim Taylor questioned the impact on the residents to the north of this property. Mr. Ehrenreich stated he would be meeting with the homeowners association, noting plans have already been discussed to make sure the area is kept clean and noise doesn’t become a factor.

Commissioner Flammini questioned when they would actually move dirt. Warner Briske stated activity would start next week.

Commissioner DeTienne questioned what would happen with season ticket holders. Mr. Ehrenreich stated
there would be various options depending on exactly what date the field opens. The best case is that the field can still open on June 11, with July 15 as the last anticipated opening date. Possible options for season ticket holders include
1) keeping the season ticket and giving free general admission for 2010, or 2) offering a complete refund with the ticket holder releasing the seat, or 3) something in between these two options.


 Mr. Ehrenreich stated if the June 11 opening can’t be met, an alternative site for one month could be the Schaumburg stadium, noting Simmons Field in Kenosha would take several thousand dollars to bring it up to a semi-pro level for the safety of the ballplayers.

Mr. DeLisle stated the 25-year lease between the City and Grand Slam Sports has a termination clause and property agreement, and will be forwarded to the attorneys for review. Mr. Colangelo stated site work done on the original site at 9th Street and Green Bay Road can still be utilized for future commercial use.

There was Council consensus to support the concept of the Lake County Fielders baseball stadium’s location at Route 173 and Green Bay Road, with agreement to place this issue on the April 20 Council meeting.

At the meeting on April 20, 2010 the city approved the plan to move the project to the new site, and over the next couple of months, the council passed various measures and agreements needed to complete the construction of temporary facilities in time for the 2010 season.  The Fielders ended up playing their opening "home" game at Carthage College in Kenosha, but eventually, the temporary field was ready, and the team played the rest of their inaugural season there. 

Despite the loss of promised State funds, the City moved ahead with the project, with the assurance that investments and grants would be enough to bring it to completion.  The benefit of hindsight argues that it might have been more prudent to shelve the project until solid funding had been obtained, or invoke the termination clause, and let everyone walk away, accepting the losses and moving on.  But, confidence still held sway in early 2011, resulting in an escalation of commitment that leads us back again to the Water Fund.

The Second Loan

At the City Council meeting of February 15, 2011, Director of Finance Pannell made a recommendation to the Council to transfer $1,764,000 dollars from the Water Fund to the General Fund in the form of a 10 year loan.  The stated purpose was to pay Panattoni Construction for work completed on the baseball stadium in 2010, in order to proceed with Phase 2 of the project. The Council approved the loan unanimously. From the meeting minutes:

BORROWING FUNDS FROM WATER FUND 
A memo (11-DOC-15) was received from Larry Pannell, requesting to borrow funds from the Water Fund. Mayor Harrison stated the City unsuccessfully attempted to secure promised funds from the State of Illinois. Initially the State did give the City $1,000,000 for the ballpark project on the northeast corner of Route 173 and Green Bay Road, stating the balance would follow soon.  
In November 2010, a certain state politician was not re-elected, after which the City received a letter stating the grant was now denied. Promised funds did not materialize, therefore the City is now in the position of facing debts owed to the general contractor. Mayor Harrison stated the contractors operated in good faith, based on promised funds from the State. The City feels it is the right thing to pay these vendors by borrowing funds from the water fund. Mayor Harrison noted support remains for the ballpark, but it cannot start on another phase leaving the vendors without payment for past work. 
Mr. Pannell stated Panattoni Construction is owed a total of approximately $1,764,000, and payment will allow the project to move forward to Phase 2 unencumbered. The total amount would be repaid over the next 10 years with interest and payments included in the fiscal year 2012 budget.  
It was moved by Commissioner Jim Taylor, seconded by Commissioner Shantal Taylor to approve borrowing $1,764,000 from the Water Fund for payment to Panattoni Construction. The vote on roll call was: Commissioners Jim Taylor, aye; Flammini, aye; DeTienne, aye; Shantal Taylor, aye; and Mayor Harrison, aye. Motion carried.
That brings the total borrowed from the Water Fund to $4.9 million.

It is important to note that there were three subsequent requests for authorization to pay vendors for work done on the stadium in 2010 totaling about $823,064. But it is not stated in the meeting minutes that the funding source was from the Water Fund. So we will set those aside, along with another $78,050.07 from the Water Operating Budget for utility relocations for the ball field in March of 2011. But, if all these expenditures were considered along with the $1.7 million loan to pay Panattoni, the total city funds expended on the stadium would be in the area of $2,665,114.07 by July of 2011.

Of course the expectation was that revenue from Grand Slam Sports (the Lake County Fielders organization) would offset these expenditures, and the money would eventually be repaid to the Water Fund.  Apparently, Grand Slam was already in financial difficulty before the start of the 2011 season, and by July the team imploded, with managers and players walking out en masse over non-payment. A shell of the team limped through the rest of the summer, not even affiliated with a league at the end.

At the City Council meeting of September 6, 2011, authorization was given to the legal counsel for the city to begin proceedings to file a suit against Grand Slam Sports for non-payment of rent, and breach of contract. Grand Slam also filed its own suit against the City, and both cases are still in the courts today. 

The Loans Forgiven

On March 6, 2012 the City Attorney put a recommendation before the Mayor and Council, that converting the loans from the Water Fund of $3,200,000 and $1,764,000 to permanent transfers would be in the best interest of the city:

RESOLUTION/MODIFYING WATER FUND TRANSERS 
Attorney Randall stated that in 2009, the City of Zion enacted a resolution to transfer funds in the amount of $3,200,000 from the Water Fund to the General Fund with specific repayment terms, and then a subsequent transfer was made in the amount of $1,764,000. It is now in the best interest of the City that these transfers be deemed permanent transfers with no repayment obligation.  
Commissioner Shantal Taylor asked the City Council to consider the sensitivity of the City’s financial outlook with reference to the Water Fund being a resource to rely on in cases of emergency. She stated that the City should be proactive and stick to the original plan to repay the Water Fund and that the upcoming budget talks should include repayment of the Water Fund. She stated these funds may be needed for repairs to the aging system.  
Mayor Harrison stated that the need to use these funds was well known. He stated that some of the funds have been repaid and the fund has recouped nicely. He stated that the City will be looking at severe budget cuts in the upcoming year and the City has no means to repay this fund. It was moved by Commissioner DeTienne, seconded by Commissioner Flammini that a Resolution (12-R-6) be passed modifying transfers from the Water Fund to the General Fund, in the amounts of $3,200,000 and $1,764,000, by deleting any and all repayment obligations. The vote on roll call was: Commissioners Shantal Taylor, nay; Flammini, aye; DeTienne, aye; Mayor Harrison, aye. Motion carried. Resolution passed.



The Final Accounting

With the $4.9 million forgiven, and an additional outstanding loan of $1.3 million, the total taken from the Water Fund comes to $6.2 million.  Much of that $4.9 million consisting of those "one-time dollars", that won't likely be seen again.  Whether those dollars were spent wisely or not, I'll leave it to you the reader, to judge.

Epilogue: The Rate Increase

In the time since I started writing this post, another City Council meeting was held on September 3, 2013.  At that meeting, the rate increases proposed by Director Knable for water, sewer and waste removal were approved.  In my opinion this was the correct and responsible course to take. If we want services, we should expect to pay for them. 

It's unfortunate that the circumstances require a larger increase now than if they had been adjusted incrementally all along as they should have been.  Equally unfortunate is that all of those "one-time dollars" have been expended as I outlined above instead of being used to improve an infrastructure that truly needs it. An opportunity lost. Let's hope that a lesson has been learned and the city does better in the future.

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Trustee No. 7 - "Paperwork, Open Meetings, and You"

Just a short installment this time, I am spending part of my Sunday reading through my Board Packet for the upcoming meeting on Tuesday.  I've had a draft of this post sitting around for over a week, so I thought I should go ahead and get it out there for you to read.

With any new job, even an appointed position, there comes the inevitable paperwork; like tax withholding, for the record, Trustees are paid $1,200 a year in monthly installments, (after taxes that comes to a whopping $87.35 a month), a surety bond (the district picks up the tab for that), and required certifications.  The last item came in the form of an email from Karen with the attached text.

Open Meetings Act

Elected and Appointed Members

OMA Electronic Training

Effective January 1, 2012, elected or appointed members of a public body subject to OMA must
complete the electronic training once during their term of election or appointment as follows:

• Any person who is an elected or appointed member of a public body subject to the Act on January 1, 2012, must complete the electronic training between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2013.

• Any person who becomes an elected or appointed member of a public body subject to the Act after
January 1, 2012, must complete the electronic training no later than the 90th day after taking the oath
of office or, if not required to take an oath of office, after otherwise assuming responsibilities as a member of the public body.

 Elected or appointed members need not complete the electronic training on an annual basis thereafter unless they are also designated to receive training on compliance with the Open Meetings Act.

The Public Access Counselor’s Office’s OMA electronic training is available free of charge at:

http://foia.ilattorneygeneral.net

I have included the link, which opens in a new window, so that if you are curious, you can take the training yourself, the only difference is that you don't get a certificate at the end. 

Overall, the training is pretty forgiving, if you get an answer wrong you can keep going back until you answer correctly.  The main concern is ensuring that the concepts of the Open Meetings Act are understood by the trainee, and hopefully will abide by them in their official actions.

This leads me back to my thoughts about how our government communicates with the public.

During my campaign for Commissioner, I advocated for more open communication between government institutions and the public they serve, and as I become more familiar with laws like the Open Meetings Act, and the Freedom Of Information Act, I become more convinced that government has a responsibility to inform and educate the public, and the public have a corresponding responsibility to learn how their government functions and performs.

I am under no illusions that such open communication would be easy.  There are those in the public sector; elected officials, and civil service employees that regard the provisions of the OMA, and especially FOIA as nuisance that diverts time and resources unnecessarily away from the work that they are doing. It is true that there are those who use those laws as a bludgeon to harass public officials that they disagree with, or even just dislike for some reason.

Whether complying with these laws is a nuisance, a hassle, or just a waste of money is beside the point. These laws were implemented to redress a history of public bodies acting in a secretive and high-handed manner that rewards select insiders at the expense of the rest of the population.

In my opinion, if a public entity takes that extra step to educate their constituents about what they are doing, and illustrate for them how those actions are for the benefit of everyone, the less cause for suspicion by the public.

That doesn't mean the average citizen is off the hook,  democracy is a team sport and we all have our parts to play.  So, every once in a while, just take a look around at all those things we take for granted on a daily basis; streets, electricity, water, sewer, fire department, and police. Ask yourself, how are these services provided, and do I know who is responsible for running them?

If you don't know, devote a little spare time to educating yourself, a little knowledge can be a great advantage, especially the next time you step into a voting booth.

As always, I welcome your comments and questions, either through the comment feature below or directly via email at fischerforzion@gmail.com .

Friday, July 26, 2013

Trustee No. 7 - "Introductions"

In the previous post "A New Opportunity" I announced my appointment to the Lake County Public Water District Board of Trustees.  I want to share with you my experiences as a first-time office holder as best as I can describe them in an irregular series that I am calling, "Trustee No. 7". Since I am filling the last spot on a seven member board, hence the title.

I want to emphasize that this post and the ones that will follow are not official communications of the LCPWD Board, but merely an account of my own thoughts and impressions as I take on a new role in public service.

After the Lake County Board approved my appointment, I checked in with Mr. Brent Paxton, the District 4 Board Member who had asked me if I would fill the trustee vacancy, to see what the next step would be.  He told me that I should expect a letter from the County Board confirming my appointment, along with a copy of the resolution. A similar letter would be sent to the Public Water District, and then they would take over the process of my orientation and so forth.

Just for reference, that information was given to me on June 12, and as of this writing, that letter hasn't yet arrived. In my conversations with Mr. Paxton prior to my acceptance he had asked if I wanted to speak with the Board Chairman about the Trustee position. I declined to do so because I wanted to approach the position, and the process without preconceptions.  Keep these points in mind as we move on.

The following Saturday,  I took a bike ride to the lakefront, and as part of my route I decided to scout out the location of the filtration plant.  I also discovered something interesting when you plug the plant address into Google Earth.

 
 
The Google map centers on the water intake pump station at the lake shore, you have actually pan out to see the plant itself, which in the image above is on the upper left side of the picture.  So now I knew where the plant was.  Surprisingly, or maybe not if you think about it, almost everyone that I have spoken to about the Public Water District were unaware of it's existence, or the location of the filtration plant.
 
Looking at the published meeting schedule on the District website lcpwd.com, I saw that the next meeting was set for June 18, at 5:30 pm.   I decided to attend as an observer since I hadn't received my official notification yet.  I arranged to catch an early train home, which arrived in Zion at about 5:23 pm, and drove directly from the station to the plant on 17th Street. 
 
For security reasons, the plant is fenced and gated to prevent unauthorized access to the facility. I pulled up to the gate and pressed the call button.  A woman's voice answered, asking if I needed help, and I told her that I was there for the Board meeting.  I think there was a little surprise in her voice, but she told me to come on in, and the automated gate started to open.  I pulled in, parked, walked up to the entrance and rang the call box at the entrance.  She answered, and told me to come upstairs as the door buzzed open. 
 
I followed her directions up to the second floor, and was met at the office entrance by a gentleman who introduced himself as Arlyn Albrecht, the General Manager. I gave him my name, and he asked me to sign in on the visitor's book, and if there was a particular issue I wanted to speak to the Board about.  The District, like all public bodies subject to the Open Meetings Act, have time built into the agenda for public comment
 
I told him that I had been appointed to the Board  the previous week and I just wanted to introduce myself and observe the meeting if I could.  He was genuinely surprised, because they hadn't received any notification from the County Board that a new Trustee had even been appointed!
 
He then led me down the hall, to the conference room, and introduced me to the assembly as the newly appointed member.  There was a moment's pause, while everyone processed the news, and then Mr. Topcik, the Chairman welcomed me and asked if I would mind giving a brief background of myself and how I came to be appointed.  I did so, with apologies for parachuting into their meeting in such a fashion.   He then asked each person to introduce themselves. The Trustees present were; Douglas Jaeger (Vice Chairman), Michael Ruchti, Amos Monk, and Dorothy Mitchell.  Trustee Richard Moe was absent.  Also present were the previously mentioned General Manager Al Albrecht, Operations Manager Don White, District Attorney Dan Kucera, and District Secretary Karen Johnston (who had been on the intercom), also present was Mr. M. David Cain from the accounting firm of Milburn Cain & Company.  Mr. Cain was there to present the audit report for the fiscal year that ended April 30th.  I was given a seat at the conference table and the office copy of the meeting agenda and the supporting documentation, the normal order of business then proceeded. 
 
I think that it was very fortunate timing that I was present for this particular meeting wherein the financial report was presented and the setting of the delivery rate for the 2014 fiscal year.  Mr. Topcik pointed out that the District is a non-profit operation, and the rate charged is calculated based on the projected costs for operations and maintenance.  After the presentation of the financial report, there were discussions of ongoing projects; concerning the raw water intake pipe that extends 3000 feet out into Lake Michigan, warranty repairs to painting that had been done inside one of the clarifier tanks, and a project to remove and prevent the rusting of stainless steel components in the tanks.
 
At the conclusion of the meeting, Don White took me for a tour of the facility and gave me a short course on the water filtration process along with some of the operational and logistic background information.
 
I must say even though my appearance was unexpected everyone involved was very gracious and helpful, and I learned quite a bit in a short period of time.  One item in particular caught my attention; the erosion of sand around the water intake pipe requires the installation of supporting structures called bents to ensure that the pipe isn't undermined and compromised.  If the pipe is breached along it's length there could be a severe reduction in the water flow to the plant, and that would be a major problem!  
 
In the next installment, I think I'll delve deeper into the intake pipe project, with an overview of the engineering required, and the process that is currently underway to obtain the proper permits to carry out the work on Lake Michigan.

For those of you reading this, if you have a question or a comment, feel free to submit it through the comment section below, or email me at fischerforzion@gmail.com .

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

A New Opportunity

To paraphrase an adage; when an endeavor in one direction is made and lost, new paths are opened that were not visible before.

One of the major themes of my campaign for Commissioner emphasized the importance of public service. The idea that we as citizens have an obligation if at all possible to participate in our system of self-governance in some way.

Now I have been given a chance to act on that idea.

After the May 7th City Council meeting, I was approached by Brent Paxton, Lake County Board Member for District 4.  Mr. Paxton asked me if I would consider filling a vacancy on the Lake County Public Water District Board of Trustees.

The Lake County Public Water District provides drinking water for the City of Zion, the Village of Winthrop Harbor, and the State of Illinois Department of Natural Resources. (Illinois Beach State Park). The water treatment facility is a vital part of the infrastructure for the region that contributes to our daily life, and is key to future growth and development.

After giving it due consideration, I submitted a letter of application to the Chairman of the Lake County Board.  Yesterday morning, the Lake County Board passed a resolution approving my appointment as a Trustee.

I see this position as a great opportunity to gain practical experience in local governance. Experience that I can build on in the future, whether on the City Council, or in some other capacity. I look forward to sharing my experiences in this new position with you here on the blog, and hopefully I can advance the twin goals of de-mystifying how local government works, and give greater recognition to a service that we all tend to take for granted.

As always, if you have a question or a comment you can post them here, or email me at: fischerforzion@gmail.com . 

Also, if you are interested, check out the Water District web page at: http://lcpwd.com .

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

The Results Are In

Not a long post tonight, I have been sending out emails to friends and supporters.  For those who haven't been following the Lake County Clerk's website breathlessly this evening, I placed fifth in a the field with 12.70% of the vote.  That is 374 out of 2,944 votes cast.

Not bad for someone who was a complete unknown just a few months ago.

Congratulations to Al Hill and Lloyd DeTienne for their wins tonight, and also our hope that they will serve the City of Zion well for the next four years.

I will probably have some final thoughts on the campaign, but not tonight.  I have to go back to work in the morning.

To everyone who cast a vote in this election, thank you.

Sincerely,

Christopher Fischer

Monday, April 8, 2013

Election Eve and the Power of Ideas

Today is April 8th, and as I type this I can see the sunset through our back window as the day draws to a close, it is now Election Eve. 

With Election Day just a few hours away now, I must take care of one order of business right off the bat; if you haven't voted yet, remember that the Polls in Illinois will open at 6:00 AM and close at 7:00 PM. If you don't know your polling place go to my website www.fischerforzion.com and look at the special Get Out The Vote page, there is a link to the Lake County Clerk's website where you can look up your polling place.  Voting is not just a right, it is a responsibility, so don't let the opportunity to exercise your fundamental right go to waste.

Now that the public service segment is out of the way, I would like to express a few thoughts about this campaign that is now drawing to a close.

Above all else this has been a campaign of ideas, and the power of ideas to move people to action.

I know that sounds like the standard power of positive thinking line, but consider where I was when I started on this path.  When I first contemplated running for the City Council about two years ago, I was completely unknown, with no ready network of friends and family to support and work for me on a campaign.

I just had an idea that I could bring a fresh perspective to the city government.  So, I spent a lot of time thinking, researching, and talking with people about what needed to be done.  Then I sat down and started drafting a platform, a set of proposals for what I think the government can accomplish.

I created this blog and the website, put the platform up and started writing posts about the campaign. Then when I filed my nomination papers, I sent out a press release inviting people to come look at what I was proposing.

I started getting emails. Just a few, but the people writing me wanted to know more, and then they wanted to meet me. Then they wanted to help me.

This past Saturday, I did my last four hour shift standing outside the Post Office handing out flyers, and I had more than one person tell me that they had voted for me, and other people who went to early voting and then came back to tell me that they had voted for me.  I've had people tell me that they like what I have written, and the answers I gave at the candidate forums.

It's wonderful, and humbling all at once to get that kind of validation.  To see how my ideas, have moved people to action.  I can only hope to be worthy of their trust if I am elected tomorrow.

In the meantime, I want to thank everyone who has contributed in any way to this campaign; handing out flyers, putting up signs, talking to people, and giving me advice and support.  Truly, I could not have come this far without all of you.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

Christopher Fischer


Friday, April 5, 2013

Final Stretch - Voter Outreach

Just to bring everyone up to date, we are now down to the last few days before Election Day on April 9th.  Here is what I will be doing for the final push to the finish.

Saturday April 6th, I will be greeting voters and handing out flyers in front of the Zion Post Office from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM.  Stop by and say hello if you like, and if you want to take some flyers to pass out anywhere you can, I will have some available.

After the Post Office closes for the day, I will be going to City Hall to early vote, and then I will be doing door-to-door flyer distribution in the area south of Shiloh Park for the rest of the afternoon. If you have time, and can cover even one block, it would be a big help. Email me at fischerforzion@gmail.com to volunteer.

Sunday morning, I will be planting more signs wherever I can, if you want a sign for your yard, let me know, I still have plenty available. Sunday afternoon I will be doing more door-to-door, so see the link above if you can help out.

For Tuesday April 9th, I have posted an information page on the Fischer For Zion website that has information on polling places, how to locate your polling place, and electioneering etiquette. The last is most important because we don't want lose votes by annoying anyone.

Finally, I want to thank all of you who have been out there putting flyers on doors and windshields and talking to people one on one, your hard work is making a real difference.  Together, I believe that we can bring real change to the city, and I hope I do you proud.

Christopher Fischer



Monday, April 1, 2013

Remarks to the Zion Township Republican Committee

This evening I participated in a candidate meet and greet with the Zion Township Republican Committee.  I am happy to report that all of the candidates for Commissioner attended, and the question and answer session I think was lively, and hopefully gave the Committee members a better picture of the candidates to share with others.   Special thanks to Marti Korpi for being our host.

Each candidate was given a ten minute window to present a statement about themselves, why they are running and what they hope to achieve if elected.  What follows is the text of my presentation as written.


Good Evening.

To begin, I wish to thank Mrs. Korpi, and the Committee for inviting us here to speak with all of you. Hopefully it will prove to be a useful and informative exchange for everyone.

Some of you may have attended the Candidate Forum held here at the Library a couple of weeks ago, or watched the videos provided by ZBGuide.com.  So, I don’t want to bore you too much by re-hashing my statement from that event. 

Instead, since I have a more generous time limit today I would like to provide a little more in depth background of myself. Then I want focus in on an item in my platform to help illustrate my conception of how the city government can help Zion grow, and develop for the future.

I was born in Kansas City Missouri, 48 years ago.  I am the eldest of four boys, my brothers Mark, John, and Matthew. My father said later that if he had planned it out, I should have been named Luke.  In those early years we lived in the suburbs on the North side of K.C., and did the typical suburban kid stuff of the time; banana seat bikes, idolizing Evel Knieval, and tree forts.

Now, my father always had this idea of getting into self-sustained small scale farming, so we moved out to a farm that we rented for a couple of years. We had goats and chickens, so I and my brother had chores every day, taking care of the animals, gathering eggs, and milking the goats. Later, we moved to another place, a pre-civil war Federalist style home located on a wooded hilltop. To be honest, it was not in the best condition, and since the primary heat source was wood burning stoves, my brother Mark and I became pretty handy at splitting wood with an axe, sledgehammer, and steel wedges.  It’s a pretty direct proposition, if you want to stay warm, split that stack of wood first.

When we moved to Indiana, the property covered about seven acres, with two ponds and a stream. Taking care of that, and the fowl, and the four head of dairy cows we boarded was a lot even with four boys to help out. Cows can’t wait to be milked, so I would have to get up at 4:00 am and take care of them before going to school.  I will say that spending a few years shoveling manure makes me more appreciative of working in an office today.

Now, at the time, I didn’t enjoy going out to the barn on a dark winter morning that much, but the lessons I learned about being self-reliant, responsible, hard-working, and honest have been the basis for everything else that I have undertaken in my life.

After High School, I joined the Army. I was a Signals Intelligence Analyst, with a Top Secret Codeword Clearance, and that is a lot of responsibility for any 19 year old. I was sent to West Germany, and to the 103rd Military Intelligence Battalion.  There, I worked with some of the smartest people I have ever met and forged friendships that endure even today. The most important of which is my wife Christie. Who took notice of me in the motor pool when I almost hit her with a 75 lb bag of camouflage I tossed off the top of a truck. She was from Indianapolis, so she often says that she went all the way to Germany to meet the boy next door. 

After our enlistments ended, we were married, and then moved to Illinois on a job offer. The job didn’t work out, so we found other employment. That is when I went into the Security business. With my military experience, I was soon put into management positions, and over time I learned some important lessons on how to be a good manager. One of the most important is that it’s easy to be a hardass; it’s a lot harder to be a leader, and a mentor.

Eventually, I took a position supervising the security staff at the American Medical Association; this was not long after we had bought our home here in Zion. Three years later, I was offered a position with the AMA in the Human Resources Division.  Where, for the last 13 years, I have had the unique opportunity to observe, and learn how a large organization functions, both good and bad.  Obviously, I can’t cover everything I have experienced and learned in the time available here tonight, but I do believe that the sum total of my experience will serve the people of Zion well if I am elected.

We face many challenges here in Zion; the housing crisis, crime, the economy, and high taxes that burden all of us.  The prescription for many of these challenges, as they concern the city, is to either cut services, or increase alternate revenue to offset the taxes on homeowners.  Rather than get caught up in the nuts and bolts of where to cut and how to raise revenue, I want to talk about how we might create a broader vision for the future of the city.

A couple of weeks ago, at the invitation of Township Supervisor Cheri Neal, I went to a candidate meet and greet with the residents at Carmel House.  We gave our presentations, and answered questions from the ladies who attended.  As things were winding up, and I was getting ready to leave, I spent a moment chatting with a Mrs. La Belle, who is 96, if I remember correctly.  She said something that has stayed with me; “I would just like Zion to be like it was back when I was a little girl.  We all knew each other, and did things together, it was nice then.” Now, obviously we cannot return to that time when everyone knew each other but, maybe we can recapture that sense of community through developing a plan for what we want Zion to become in the future.

One part of my platform proposes creating a new Comprehensive Development Plan for the city.  One of the great things about our time is the availability of information. If you have an idea, you can bet that someone somewhere has had a similar idea and actually put it into practice.

One of the examples I found, is the Southern Illinois town of Pinckneyville.  The citizens there decided to take control of the development of their town, establish a vision for the future, and created the mechanisms to carry it out.  The primary means to establish this vision was the creation of a non profit Foundation that combines the efforts of the government, the business community, and the citizens.  Through their efforts, guided by a strategic plan, this small city was able, among other things, to establish the Illinois High School Basketball Hall of Fame, which has become a destination for visitors to the area.

Zion should take advantage of examples like Pinckneyville. To learn to develop destination drivers, to involve people using techniques like crowd sourcing; developing an interactive communication with the public to create community initiatives to promote the city, and to make it a more desirable place to live and work.  Above all, if the public has a substantial role in conceiving a new development plan, it invests them in the community and gives them a greater stake in working to achieve the goals that have been set forth.

In essence, what I am proposing is creating an environment that encourages a sense of public service, not only in our elected officials, but in the community as a whole.  With a vision to guide us, and some good old hard work, I think we can get to know each other better, and do some great things for this city.

So, that is a little about me, where I am from, and where I hope we can go together.  If you share that vision, I hope that you will give me your support on Election Day.

Thank You.

Saturday, March 30, 2013

A Public Hearing - An Empty House

In my writings, on the web page, facebook and this blog I often mention the level of disengagement between the city government and the public. Before I head out to stump in front of the Post Office today, I remembered something that I hadn't shared publicly yet.

On March 19th, at 6:00pm, there was a Public Hearing about the referendum on Electrical Aggregation held in the Council chamber at City Hall.  Briefly, aggregation means that the City would select an electricity provider and negotiate a price for all residents and businesses in Zion. Anyone who doesn't like the negotiated rate can opt out and choose their own provider.

Since it was a workday, I went right to city hall after getting off the train and arrived at 6:15 pm. I walked in and found the room empty, with the exception of the Council members; Flammini, DeTienne, Shantal Taylor, and Mayor Pro-Tem Jim Taylor presiding.  At the podium was a representative of NIMEC, Northern Illinois Municipal Electric Collaborative, the agency that will be brokering the aggregation process if the referendum passes.

I sat in the back as I usually do, just to observe.  I think one other person was in the audience.  The presenter finished answering questions from the Council members.  Mr. Taylor announced that the floor was open for public comment, and there being none, there was a motion to adjourn. That was it, the whole public hearing on a process that may determine what everyone in Zion will pay for electricity for the next two years.

Now, I can't fault the city for not providing notice to the public, the hearings have been announced at City Council meetings, posted on the city website, and published in the Zion Benton News.  All these notifications meet the requirements of the law on open meetings. The letter of the law is being upheld, but is the spirit?

The Sunday after that, I went to a gathering of some supporters of mine, and in the discussion I asked if anyone had been aware of the hearing about electrical aggregation.  None of them knew about the hearing, and these are people who are actively interested in the city and how it functions.  I think we have a lot of hard work ahead to get the public and the government talking to each other.

The next public hearing on Electrical Aggregation will be this coming Tuesday, April 2nd, 6:30 pm at City Hall. Self-governance requires us to participate in the process too. So, I encourage anyone who can to attend, even if it is just to listen and learn about what is being proposed. 

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Get Out The Vote (GOTV) Information on the website

I've updated the website with information for GOTV as voting begins tomorrow.

Early voting starts March 25th, and we being the final push towards Election Day on April 9th. I've added a new page to the site, giving information on polling places and actions you can take part in between now and when the polls finally close. Go to: Get Out The Vote & Polling Places to learn more. If we want to bring change to Zion, we need to get voters to the polls. Every Voter is Important, and Every Vote Counts!

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Outside the Post Office - A Candidate's View

As those of you who have been reading this blog, receiving campaign updates via email, or facebook are aware; today I was outside the Zion Post Office meeting voters and handing out flyer's. While the experience is still fresh in my mind, I thought it would be useful to record my impressions of the day.

The mission for today was, Basic Campaigning 101, meet the voters and get the message out.

You just need the stamina to stay on your feet for over four hours, keep your hands warm enough to not have to wear gloves (handling paper with gloves is nearly impossible), and greet every person coming out of the post office with the same enthusiasm as the first person who came out at 9:07 am. Luck was with me this morning, and I had a nice sunny day to be outside.

Physically, I think I did pretty well, though my left knee is sending me some nasty notes reminding me that I also spent three hours the day before going door to door.  Also, my face is now sunburned.

Overall, the impression I received was positive, and that makes me hopeful. For all the grousing about how coarse our society has become, at heart we are still a polite people. When greeted respectfully, most people will pause to listen, take the flyer, and say "Thank You" or "Good Luck" and then move on. 

Out of the 300 or so people I approached today, only two refused to talk with me because they had already decided to vote for another candidate. One man was so adamant that he had already decided who to vote for that he practically ran to his car to get away from me!

Some people did stop and talk with me; a gentleman asked how long I had lived here (17 years), a lady asked if I was related to the Fischer's in Winthrop Harbor (it's possible), and several asked if I am a Democrat or a Republican. I always remind them that it is a non-partisan election, and then I give them an honest answer. (If you want to know what that answer is, ask me and I'll tell you.)

Others expressed their frustration with how the city is being run, a few aired grievances over past conflicts with the Building Department, or a particular Commissioner. A few even said that they had read my Candidate Profile in the Zion Benton News and quite liked it. That last item makes me feel particularly good.

In the end, it was time well spent, and now I have a better appreciation of this time honored tradition; meeting people face to face, talking with, and listening to them is a requirement that must be met before anyone can presume to speak for them as their representative.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget, early voting starts on March 25th, election day is April 9th.  I will be posting Get Out the Vote activities in the next few days, and if you believe that Zion needs a change, I am asking for your help to make it happen.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Christopher Fischer


Thursday, March 21, 2013

Candiate Profile - Unabridged Version

Today's edition of the Zion Benton News features the profiles of the candidates for the office of Commissioner in Zion.  Of necessity, the version printed in the paper has been edited for space considerations.

For those who are interested, here is the full text that I provided to the ZB News.


Q1. What are your qualifications?

A1. Under the law, a prospective candidate must meet a basic set of standards in order to run for or hold a public office. The candidate must be of legal age, a registered voter in the district for the office being sought, have resided in said district for a period of one year, not owe any back taxes or other fees to the city, and finally ‘must not have been convicted in any court located in the United States of any infamous crime, bribery, perjury, or other felony’.  Another way to say it would be; a law abiding citizen who takes an active role in our participatory democracy.

I have been a homeowner and taxpayer in good standing since my wife and I moved to Zion in 1995. Also, I have served as a Lake County Election Judge since 2004. So, I satisfy those basic qualifications. Beyond that, I offer a brief summary of my experience and knowledge.

For the past thirteen years I have been employed in the Human Resources department of the American Medical Association in Chicago.  During my tenure, I have acquired good hands-on education not only in the technical aspects of employee benefits and compensation, but also in the various facets of people management required in a large, nationally prominent organization.

Prior to working at the AMA, I spent over a decade in the Private Security industry, often as an Account Manager.  As such, I had the responsibility ensure my staff performed their duties to the client’s satisfaction.  Those responsibilities covered everything from interviewing applicants, training staff, rating job performance, and on occasion terminating someone’s employment.

After graduating High School, I volunteered for the U. S. Army and served as a Military Intelligence Analyst.  My military training provided the basis for all of the technical and leadership skills I have developed since.  In addition, there are the invaluable lessons learned regarding the importance of; discipline, duty, honor, loyalty, and teamwork.

I believe that out of the sum total of my experience I can bring a set of organizational and management skills to the office of Commissioner that will serve the people of Zion well if I am elected.

Q2. Why are you running for office?

A2. I believe that as citizens in a democracy it is important to take an active role in our government, especially on the local level. Over the past couple of years I’ve observed what can best be described as an unfortunate level of dysfunction in the City Council.  I shared my concerns with other residents, and even wrote editorial letters that appeared in this publication that were critical of this behavior and urging changes to remedy it.  After much consideration, I determined that bringing change to the Council requires a change in the membership, and that it was my responsibility as a citizen to step forward as a candidate to bring about that change.

Q3. What do you think are the most critical issues facing the City of Zion right now?

A3. The critical issues facing Zion are the same as those faced by many municipalities today. Some of the most prominent ones are; crime, a crumbling civic infrastructure, the surplus of abandoned or foreclosed homes, slow economic growth, and the problem of maintaining essential city services during a time of rising costs and a diminishing tax base.

Q4. What do you hope to achieve if elected?  


A4.  A man I know, who is a life-long resident of Zion, once told me, “I used to go to the City Council meetings, but they never said anything, so I stopped going.” I think that statement is emblematic of the gulf that exists between the City Council and the citizens of Zion.   


I would hope to change that dynamic, to begin to bring the city government out of its remote, authoritarian past into a more open, responsive, and innovative future.
 

A declaration of good intentions, however sincerely made, is insufficient without plans and proposals to give them focus and direction. The challenges facing our city are often interrelated, and that while there is not a single answer to any problem, in the following platform are areas where I believe the City Council should focus their efforts toward improvements in the near term, and beginning long term planning for the future.

Near Term


 
·         Public Safety. Keeping the public safe in their homes and in their persons is perhaps the paramount duty of our city government. Our quality of life, the desirability of the city as place to live or work, and even the value of our homes and businesses are all directly affected by how well this task is accomplished. Making sure that our Police and Fire Departments are properly equipped and fully staffed with trained professionals is not a luxury, it is a necessity that we must support with solid funding.  Both departments have made great efforts to obtain grants and special funding in order to maintain services. This is commendable, but the City needs to step up and do its part for our first responders.

 

·         Economic Development. Encouraging new business ventures to come to the city is key to creating the revenue base that will support city services and help reduce the tax burden on homeowners.  That is why I publicly supported the approval of the Big Chicago Brewery.  A multifaceted development plan that brings in more niche industries such as the Brewery, and more light industrial projects such as the proposed biomass reactor project for Trumpet Park, is what is needed to move the city forward in this area.

 
·         Review Staffing and Resources. Tight budgets have already resulted in staff and service cutbacks, a trend that will likely continue into the foreseeable future. There should be a top-down review of all departments, independent of the budget process; focusing on resource allocation, implementing efficiencies, and reducing costs over the long term.

 
·         Revitalize Home Ownership. Housing stock currently comprises one of the largest assets of the City, and is the foundation of a living, growing community. Keeping it viable is of the greatest importance. The City should actively encourage; home improvements, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing properties. Modification of the Building and Zoning Codes may be required, a topic that is further explored in the Long Term planning.  Also, there should be a push to identify and promote state and federal programs to assist property owners with those efforts.

 
·         Rental Property Licensing and Inspection. The collapse of housing values has resulted in a corresponding increase of residential rental properties, often owned by absentee landlords or property management companies. Unfortunately, distance tends to foster an attitude of neglect, and proper maintenance is often exchanged for profit. A well-regulated program to register and inspect rental properties is vital in order to sustain the value of neighboring properties, and to ensure the health and safety of the tenants.

 
·         Abandoned Residential Property. The other aspect of the housing crisis is the increase in vacant properties, and the resulting negative aspects associated with them. Resources must be directed to identify abandoned properties, and making the lien holder accountable for the maintenance of that property.

 
·         Greater Transparency and Open Communication.  There should be an expanded use of social media to inform the public about the work being done on their behalf.  Documents such as Appropriations, and the City Budget should be made available on the City website for download. City Council meetings should be recorded and the highlights posted on the Internet. City Departments have already taken steps in this direction; the Council should do the same.


Long Term


·         A Renewed Comprehensive Development Plan.  In 1992 the City Council approved the 2010 Comprehensive Development Plan. As with most plans aspects have changed over time due to circumstances.

I believe it is time to make an overall reassessment of future development in the City. Some of the areas that an updated plan should address are:
 

o   Lakefront Development. Currently, the removal of the decommissioned Zion Nuclear Power Station is scheduled to be completed in 2020, just eight short years from now. Plans for the future use of that land must take into consideration; habitat preservation, recreational use, access to the neighboring State Park, and the hard fact that there will be a nuclear waste storage facility located there for the foreseeable future.  The lakeshore area has the potential to become a tremendous asset to the future growth of the City. If planning for the post-decommission phase hasn’t been started, it should become a top priority.

 
o   Review Zoning and Building Codes. The recent controversy surrounding the move of the Big Chicago Brewing Company to Zion is an example of the difficulties that arise when codes have become outdated. Homeowners can also find themselves hindered by restrictive standards and thus discouraged from making improvements to their property. An open review process which solicits input from the public could help identify problem areas and suggest possible remedies.

 
o   Civic Infrastructure. Maintaining aging buildings and the equipment necessary to keep them functioning can become a greater drain on the taxpayer than the financial investment in newer, more efficient structures.  In this time of economic distress, it is hard to imagine making such an investment, but plans that are made with careful consideration now will result in substantial savings in the future.
 

·         Encourage “Destination Driver” Enterprises. Unique cultural, entertainment, or recreational experiences attract visitors to the city, boost collateral spending, and provide local employment opportunities.  For example, the nucleus of such a driver might center on a new multiplex to replace the now shuttered Dunes movie theatre, an art gallery in the downtown business district, a recreation center, or even a unique restaurant.  The economic benefits resulting from investments that encourage culture and entertainment are well documented, and such an environment improves the quality of life for the community as a whole.

 
·         Leverage Regional Planning Resources.  The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (www.cmap.org) has as part of its charter the Local Technical Assistance Program (LTA), which provides planning assistance to local governments that apply for a project grant.  Our neighbors in Antioch recently obtained an LTA grant to develop a new bike and pedestrian corridor in the city. Other cities are using the LTA to create Comprehensive Development plans. If we are truly serious about planning for the Zion of the future, we should take advantage of every tool that is available to us, and CMAP could be very useful to us.   

 

In Conclusion


 
“Even small governments make big decisions”. It’s a concept that merits repetition. Government exists to provide services that we cannot accomplish as individuals.  The decisions that our public servants make today will have a real impact on our quality of life tomorrow, and for years to come.

The proposals I have laid out in this platform are starting points at best, perhaps they are the beginnings of an agenda to move Zion into the future.  I don’t claim to have the answer to every problem, but I do have an idea that bringing a fresh perspective to the City Council will put us on the path to finding those answers.   If you agree, I hope that you will support me with your vote on April 9th.  

Sunday, March 17, 2013

The Candidate Forum - A Brief Comment

Yesterday, I participated in the Candidate Forum for Zion City and Township offices that are up for election on April 9th.  The forum was hosted by the Zion and Winthrop Harbor Chambers of Commerce and the Zion Benton Public Library. Democracy relies upon an informed electorate, so a big thanks to them for putting this event together.

This was my first time ever participating in a Q & A event like this, so I admit that I was a bit nervous. The reviews from people in the audience afterward was that I did pretty well, I hope that the video of the event will confirm that.  The sponsors will be posting that video at www.zbguide.com , and I encourage everyone to take a look and let me know how I did, and if there are questions you would like to ask me,  just put them in the comments section here on the blog.

Now it's the next day, and I'm sitting here with a cup of coffee, checking my usual online news sources, and reflecting on the forum and how it went.

One thing stands out, one thing that really troubles me; neither of the incumbent Commissioners participated in the forum.

Lloyd DeTienne and Shantal Taylor both declined to attend, citing prior commitments.

 I received my invitation from Nann Blaine Hilyard, the Library Director on February 5th. ( I should mention that Nann did a great job as the moderator yesterday.)  Mr. DeTienne and Ms. Taylor must lead very busy lives indeed, if there is something on their calendars more important than explaining why people should vote to keep them in office.

Speaking of presenting yourself, I have accepted invitations to two upcoming events, the first, a meet and greet with voters hosted by the Zion Democratic Precinct Committeemen will be on March 22,  at 6:30 pm, at the Zion Park District on Dowie Memorial Drive. 

The second is the regular meeting of the Zion Township Republican Committee, at the Zion Benton Public Library, on April 1st at 7:00 pm. This event is just for the members and their guests. I am looking forward to meeting them and answering their questions.


Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Old School Advertising

Before I get to the topic: Reminder, the Candidate Forum will be this coming Saturday at the Zion Benton Public Library. The event starts at 1:30 pm.  Attend if you can, and bring a question. I look forward to seeing and speaking with you.
 
Now that there is less than 30 days to election day and early voting even closer, it's time to use some traditional media. So I've purchased some ad space...

Sneak Peek
Keep an eye on upcoming issues of the Zion Benton News, my campaign ads will be published in the March 21st and April 4th issues. Also coming soon in the ZB News will be my responses to their Candidate Questionnaire.

And using my own skills and a bit of sweat-equity, I put together a big sign to supplement my stock of yard signs. (Before anyone asks, I made sure that it meets the limits set by the sign ordinance.)

Showing off my work.

I did reposition it to better spot, after this picture was taken, if you drive past the corner of 173 and Ezekiel you can't miss it.

Speaking of yard signs, I have a lot to give out yet.  If you want to spread the news of the campaign, let me know and I will bring the sign to you.  Also, I have plenty of fliers in door hanger bags, ready to go for anyone ambitious to distribute them.



Saturday, March 2, 2013

1000 Door hangers and 200 Signs

Update: The signs have arrived! Everyone who has requested one, I will get in touch with and drop them off with you this weekend.



Ready to Go

Door hangers


As of this morning we are just 38 days away from the election, and if you have read my previous posts you know that I will be attending various campaign events in March.  The one that I hope many of you will attend is the Candidate Forum at the Zion-Benton Public Library on March 16th, at 1:30 pm.

If you have been curious about what I have been doing the past week or so, aside from shoveling snow, just look at the image above.  I have been printing, cutting, and bagging 1000 campaign fliers for distribution.  The goal is to deliver these to homes across as broad a section of the city as possible in the next couple of weeks.

I haven't made a point of this before, but this really is a grassroots effort to raise awareness of the campaign, and the importance of the election.  I have not solicited any campaign donations, all the costs have been out of pocket, with the exception of those of you who have printed fliers at home using the DIY documents I posted on the web (and if you have been printing your own, Thank You!).

This distribution is distinct from the Door-to-Door Voter Outreach, as I am not looking to actually knock on doors, but focus on getting these out to homes, and hopefully get more people talking, supporting, and voting.

To really make this work, I am asking that anyone who can take some of these fliers and hang them on doors in their neighborhood to contact me at fischerforzion@gmail.com .  Whether you can take a hundred or a handful, it would be a great help.

 

Signs


The other project that I undertook this past week was to order yard signs, a requirement for any campaign.

Coming Soon!
They're Here!
 
The shipment of 200 signs should arrive in the next couple of days.  Anyone who wants to place a sign in their yard, email me so I can start a list and get them out to you. 

Fliers and signs are just tools, what I believe will really help in the end, is that everyone who reads these fliers, sees the signs, or looks up the website, will care enough about the city and it's future to talk about it with others.  If enough people start talking, then we can get them to act, and get them to vote!

I look forward to hearing from you.

Christopher Fischer