Thursday, March 21, 2013

Candiate Profile - Unabridged Version

Today's edition of the Zion Benton News features the profiles of the candidates for the office of Commissioner in Zion.  Of necessity, the version printed in the paper has been edited for space considerations.

For those who are interested, here is the full text that I provided to the ZB News.


Q1. What are your qualifications?

A1. Under the law, a prospective candidate must meet a basic set of standards in order to run for or hold a public office. The candidate must be of legal age, a registered voter in the district for the office being sought, have resided in said district for a period of one year, not owe any back taxes or other fees to the city, and finally ‘must not have been convicted in any court located in the United States of any infamous crime, bribery, perjury, or other felony’.  Another way to say it would be; a law abiding citizen who takes an active role in our participatory democracy.

I have been a homeowner and taxpayer in good standing since my wife and I moved to Zion in 1995. Also, I have served as a Lake County Election Judge since 2004. So, I satisfy those basic qualifications. Beyond that, I offer a brief summary of my experience and knowledge.

For the past thirteen years I have been employed in the Human Resources department of the American Medical Association in Chicago.  During my tenure, I have acquired good hands-on education not only in the technical aspects of employee benefits and compensation, but also in the various facets of people management required in a large, nationally prominent organization.

Prior to working at the AMA, I spent over a decade in the Private Security industry, often as an Account Manager.  As such, I had the responsibility ensure my staff performed their duties to the client’s satisfaction.  Those responsibilities covered everything from interviewing applicants, training staff, rating job performance, and on occasion terminating someone’s employment.

After graduating High School, I volunteered for the U. S. Army and served as a Military Intelligence Analyst.  My military training provided the basis for all of the technical and leadership skills I have developed since.  In addition, there are the invaluable lessons learned regarding the importance of; discipline, duty, honor, loyalty, and teamwork.

I believe that out of the sum total of my experience I can bring a set of organizational and management skills to the office of Commissioner that will serve the people of Zion well if I am elected.

Q2. Why are you running for office?

A2. I believe that as citizens in a democracy it is important to take an active role in our government, especially on the local level. Over the past couple of years I’ve observed what can best be described as an unfortunate level of dysfunction in the City Council.  I shared my concerns with other residents, and even wrote editorial letters that appeared in this publication that were critical of this behavior and urging changes to remedy it.  After much consideration, I determined that bringing change to the Council requires a change in the membership, and that it was my responsibility as a citizen to step forward as a candidate to bring about that change.

Q3. What do you think are the most critical issues facing the City of Zion right now?

A3. The critical issues facing Zion are the same as those faced by many municipalities today. Some of the most prominent ones are; crime, a crumbling civic infrastructure, the surplus of abandoned or foreclosed homes, slow economic growth, and the problem of maintaining essential city services during a time of rising costs and a diminishing tax base.

Q4. What do you hope to achieve if elected?  


A4.  A man I know, who is a life-long resident of Zion, once told me, “I used to go to the City Council meetings, but they never said anything, so I stopped going.” I think that statement is emblematic of the gulf that exists between the City Council and the citizens of Zion.   


I would hope to change that dynamic, to begin to bring the city government out of its remote, authoritarian past into a more open, responsive, and innovative future.
 

A declaration of good intentions, however sincerely made, is insufficient without plans and proposals to give them focus and direction. The challenges facing our city are often interrelated, and that while there is not a single answer to any problem, in the following platform are areas where I believe the City Council should focus their efforts toward improvements in the near term, and beginning long term planning for the future.

Near Term


 
·         Public Safety. Keeping the public safe in their homes and in their persons is perhaps the paramount duty of our city government. Our quality of life, the desirability of the city as place to live or work, and even the value of our homes and businesses are all directly affected by how well this task is accomplished. Making sure that our Police and Fire Departments are properly equipped and fully staffed with trained professionals is not a luxury, it is a necessity that we must support with solid funding.  Both departments have made great efforts to obtain grants and special funding in order to maintain services. This is commendable, but the City needs to step up and do its part for our first responders.

 

·         Economic Development. Encouraging new business ventures to come to the city is key to creating the revenue base that will support city services and help reduce the tax burden on homeowners.  That is why I publicly supported the approval of the Big Chicago Brewery.  A multifaceted development plan that brings in more niche industries such as the Brewery, and more light industrial projects such as the proposed biomass reactor project for Trumpet Park, is what is needed to move the city forward in this area.

 
·         Review Staffing and Resources. Tight budgets have already resulted in staff and service cutbacks, a trend that will likely continue into the foreseeable future. There should be a top-down review of all departments, independent of the budget process; focusing on resource allocation, implementing efficiencies, and reducing costs over the long term.

 
·         Revitalize Home Ownership. Housing stock currently comprises one of the largest assets of the City, and is the foundation of a living, growing community. Keeping it viable is of the greatest importance. The City should actively encourage; home improvements, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing properties. Modification of the Building and Zoning Codes may be required, a topic that is further explored in the Long Term planning.  Also, there should be a push to identify and promote state and federal programs to assist property owners with those efforts.

 
·         Rental Property Licensing and Inspection. The collapse of housing values has resulted in a corresponding increase of residential rental properties, often owned by absentee landlords or property management companies. Unfortunately, distance tends to foster an attitude of neglect, and proper maintenance is often exchanged for profit. A well-regulated program to register and inspect rental properties is vital in order to sustain the value of neighboring properties, and to ensure the health and safety of the tenants.

 
·         Abandoned Residential Property. The other aspect of the housing crisis is the increase in vacant properties, and the resulting negative aspects associated with them. Resources must be directed to identify abandoned properties, and making the lien holder accountable for the maintenance of that property.

 
·         Greater Transparency and Open Communication.  There should be an expanded use of social media to inform the public about the work being done on their behalf.  Documents such as Appropriations, and the City Budget should be made available on the City website for download. City Council meetings should be recorded and the highlights posted on the Internet. City Departments have already taken steps in this direction; the Council should do the same.


Long Term


·         A Renewed Comprehensive Development Plan.  In 1992 the City Council approved the 2010 Comprehensive Development Plan. As with most plans aspects have changed over time due to circumstances.

I believe it is time to make an overall reassessment of future development in the City. Some of the areas that an updated plan should address are:
 

o   Lakefront Development. Currently, the removal of the decommissioned Zion Nuclear Power Station is scheduled to be completed in 2020, just eight short years from now. Plans for the future use of that land must take into consideration; habitat preservation, recreational use, access to the neighboring State Park, and the hard fact that there will be a nuclear waste storage facility located there for the foreseeable future.  The lakeshore area has the potential to become a tremendous asset to the future growth of the City. If planning for the post-decommission phase hasn’t been started, it should become a top priority.

 
o   Review Zoning and Building Codes. The recent controversy surrounding the move of the Big Chicago Brewing Company to Zion is an example of the difficulties that arise when codes have become outdated. Homeowners can also find themselves hindered by restrictive standards and thus discouraged from making improvements to their property. An open review process which solicits input from the public could help identify problem areas and suggest possible remedies.

 
o   Civic Infrastructure. Maintaining aging buildings and the equipment necessary to keep them functioning can become a greater drain on the taxpayer than the financial investment in newer, more efficient structures.  In this time of economic distress, it is hard to imagine making such an investment, but plans that are made with careful consideration now will result in substantial savings in the future.
 

·         Encourage “Destination Driver” Enterprises. Unique cultural, entertainment, or recreational experiences attract visitors to the city, boost collateral spending, and provide local employment opportunities.  For example, the nucleus of such a driver might center on a new multiplex to replace the now shuttered Dunes movie theatre, an art gallery in the downtown business district, a recreation center, or even a unique restaurant.  The economic benefits resulting from investments that encourage culture and entertainment are well documented, and such an environment improves the quality of life for the community as a whole.

 
·         Leverage Regional Planning Resources.  The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (www.cmap.org) has as part of its charter the Local Technical Assistance Program (LTA), which provides planning assistance to local governments that apply for a project grant.  Our neighbors in Antioch recently obtained an LTA grant to develop a new bike and pedestrian corridor in the city. Other cities are using the LTA to create Comprehensive Development plans. If we are truly serious about planning for the Zion of the future, we should take advantage of every tool that is available to us, and CMAP could be very useful to us.   

 

In Conclusion


 
“Even small governments make big decisions”. It’s a concept that merits repetition. Government exists to provide services that we cannot accomplish as individuals.  The decisions that our public servants make today will have a real impact on our quality of life tomorrow, and for years to come.

The proposals I have laid out in this platform are starting points at best, perhaps they are the beginnings of an agenda to move Zion into the future.  I don’t claim to have the answer to every problem, but I do have an idea that bringing a fresh perspective to the City Council will put us on the path to finding those answers.   If you agree, I hope that you will support me with your vote on April 9th.  

No comments:

Post a Comment